CIO Insights 2Q2026

By some yardsticks, the US-led secular bull market stretches well into its fifth decade by now, tracing its origins to Fed chairman Paul Volcker’s decisive fight against inflation in the early 1980s. In retrospect, taking on ever more risk has turned out well during the relentless move higher, if one could withstand sporadic jolts such as the 87-crash, the TMT bubble of the late ‘90s, the subprime crisis in ‘07/’08 or Covid-19. We thus live in an era where one feels pressure, if not a certain inevitability, to invest in equities. Savers in all age brackets are being advised to increase their allocation to stocks to be able to adequately fund their retirement. Retail traders have become conditioned “to buy the dip” whenever there is the slightest pullback in price. The casual advice typically heard in all extended bull runs is that “the only risk is not being invested enough.” Fintechs facilitate implementation by providing low-cost, easy-to-use apps to trade whatever and whenever we feel like. In institutional money management, meanwhile, some investment vehicles’ widespread use can be attributed in good measure to the long-running stock market boom. Prominent examples include equity index funds and active equity funds with a relative performance target. More far-reaching still, the bulk of investment allocations by pension plans and other long-duration savings arrangements is commonly channeled towards such funds.

Given the vast sums of money at stake, it is understandable that the securities industry habitually sees bright skies ahead for the markets’ favorite stocks. Intuitively appealing growth stories dominate most investment views. As a current example, the narrative on artificial intelligence revolves, in a first phase, around the key players in the build-out of the digital and physical infrastructure necessary for its diffusion (the enablers). In the second stage, AI promises to unlock new growth opportunities and productivity gains for all those willing to embrace it (the enabled). By extension, those who don’t adapt swiftly and decisively enough will have a hard time remaining competitive (the disrupted). This oversimplified win-or-lose categorization, in turn, may even cause corporate decision-makers to rush into an undue investment-for-growth mode. It could tempt them to raise spending on discretionary capex or to make acquisitions they didn’t plan for, while perhaps tapping in the dark regarding the expected payoff. There is nothing inherently wrong with using growth as a value driver. However, investors and corporate managers alike should always rationally assess plausibility and think through the ramifications before progressing.

We believe that value investing the way we practice it presents a tangible approach for investors looking to balance the overwhelming growth bias in most opinions and recommendations. First, we don’t play the relative-return game. Our focus on long-term absolute return frees us from the shackles of implicitly being required to take a view on everything at all times. We can wait for the right investment opportunity to emerge, irrespective of what the stock market is doing. Second, we adhere to a margin-of-safety discipline. It prevents us from making the common mistake of overpaying for growth. Third, we look for levers where corporate value can be unlocked unrelated to growth. For instance, we seek out bargains around corporate consolidation or reorganization, cost and capital efficiency, capital structure optimizations, or the identification of higher-and-better-use of assets (e.g., land repurposing). Fourth, we do not hesitate to invest in what we understand to be low- or no-growth industries, provided that the company in question can pull off a successful harvesting strategy. And fifth, as contrarians we tend to be wary of industries or investment paradigms in which companies feel compelled to fund major new projects in unseasoned ventures and technologies, or explore M&A deals, just to keep up with what competitors are doing. We concentrate on situations where firms have the leeway to undertake capex on a voluntary and countercyclical basis.

While the seemingly irresistible secular growth story in equities continues, we opt to stay true to our philosophy of patient bargain hunting. We diligently look for stocks that have unjustifiably fallen by the wayside. The value drivers we identify in our investments may or may not involve growth. We refuse to become “reluctant bulls” who believe they have no choice but to play along, and we consider it a privilege to be discerning rather than accommodating investors.

Sincerely,

Gregor Trachsel
Chief Investment Officer SG Value Partners AG